Deficiency returns and service/proof follow-up show the oldest open work.
5 items at 15+ daysSee which queues need attention today.
A public-safe system health view for court leaders: queue aging, overloaded units, packet rework, service and proof blockers, and the operational items that need supervisor review.
North Valley and Riverport show elevated intake-to-touch pressure.
2 units above target loadSignature, venue, service proof, and financial attachment issues drive the most corrections.
48 fictional correctionsEight scheduled matters still need readiness work before court review.
8 readiness gapsService/proof exceptions are concentrated in corrected packets awaiting final review.
11 open exceptionsEscalate aging corrections, rebalance intake coverage, and clear service/proof blockers.
3 priority actionsFictional court units are shown as aggregate workload indicators, not as case-level detail.
Move two trained reviewers to North Valley intake until the 8–14 day band returns to target.
Batch follow-up on corrected packets that have hearing dates but still lack filed proof.
Update public guidance where the same missing-document patterns keep returning.
Tracking recurring issues helps leadership improve forms, public guidance, clerk triage rules, and hearing-readiness checks.
- Show aggregate backlog, age bands, slotting lag, and correction rates.
- Do not publish party names, protected matter details, sealed content, or case-level narratives.
- Separate public performance metrics from internal supervisor work queues.